The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

For example, in the United Kingdom most of dangerous waste products are buried underground, at least
82 percent, more in comparison with Republic of Korea and Sweden. It is most noticeable that the main
way to dispose dangerous material is recycling in Republic of Korea and Sweden. They are accounted for
69 percent and 25 percent respectively; however, recycling does not have any role in disposal
procedures in the United Kingdom.

From the other side, dumping at sea and chemical treatment are usable ways to reduce hazardous
products in the United Kingdom, yet they are not useable ways in three other countries.

In addition, incineration takes up various percentages; for example, the most percentage is 25 in
Sweden and the least feature is 2 in the United Kingdom.

In conclusion, Republic of Korea and Sweden try to use recycle materials; however, United Kingdom
produces very few recycling material.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roducts are buried underground, at least 82 percent, more in comparison with Repu...
^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den. It is most noticeable that the main way to dispose dangerous material is rec...
^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Korea and Sweden. They are accounted for 69 percent and 25 percent respectively; ...
^^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percent respectively; however, recycling does not have any role in disposal p...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spectively; however, recycling does not have any role in disposal procedures ...
^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, recycling does not have any role in disposal procedures in the United King...
^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng does not have any role in disposal procedures in the United Kingdom. Fr...
^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocedures in the United Kingdom. From the other side, dumping at sea and chemi...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment are usable ways to reduce hazardous products in the United Kingdom, yet they...
^^^
Line 10, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries. In addition, incineration takes up various percentages; for examp...
^^
Line 10, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In addition, incineration takes up various percentages; for example, the mo...
^^
Line 10, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or example, the most percentage is 25 in Sweden and the least feature is 2 in the...
^^^
Line 11, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast feature is 2 in the United Kingdom. In conclusion, Republic of Korea and Swe...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cycle materials; however, United Kingdom produces very few recycling material.
^^^
Line 14, column 15, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun recycling seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little recycling'.
Suggestion: little recycling
...however, United Kingdom produces very few recycling material.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31081081081 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83236280088 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7536714653 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08106009397 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457176834185 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510369128955 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032781856055 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476781578802 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.