The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below.» You should write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below.
» You should write at least 150 words.

The two pie charts illustrate the highest education's background of women in someland in the years 1945 and 1995.

Overall, women without schooling and year 3 comprised the highest learning's proportion, while the first-degree sector was the least at the beginning of the period. In comparison, after 50 years the lowest level of education achieved by women was the 9th grade which means there was a profound rise in the country's knowledge.

The 12th grade accounted for 4% of the highest grade of women in someland in 1945 and experienced a more than fivefold increase to 20% in 1995, while the first-degree women had an enormous growth from 1% to half of the education's segment. Moreover, there was an appearance of the postgraduate made up to 20% of learning's achievement of women in this nation in the final year.

When it comes to downswings, in 1995 there were disappearances of highest female education regarding schooling, 3rd grade, 6th grade which accounted by 35%, 35%, and 15% respectively. In contrast, the contribution of 9th-grade women remained constant over 50 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in someland in the years 1945 and 1995. Overall, women without schooling and yea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofound rise in the countrys knowledge. The 12th grade accounted for 4% of the h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...women in this nation in the final year. When it comes to downswings, in 1995 the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...ings, in 1995 there were disappearances of highest female education regarding schooling, 3...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...women remained constant over 50 years.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, moreover, regarding, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12290502793 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9764427821 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9459089522 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183010688398 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986476217869 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898382165226 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142830148961 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931380185739 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.