The rendered pie charts depict the information pertaining the positive and negative aspects of visit to Bowen Island on the basis of tourist's survey. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
At a fleeting glance, it is vivid that exactly half ratio of visitors recommends the high cost of living as major disadvantage. Food quality contributes merely 10% of the same. According to the one-fourth proportion of people, there is lack of entertainment. Weather is another demerit of island which is 15% of all the portion.
Moving further, the people of the island attract travellers most with 42%. Not far behind, around one third of visitors favour the scenery of that place. 12% of tourists travel to the island due to culture which is closely followed by the proportion of people who favour good accommodation which is 11%.
Overall, high cost of living is major drawback of the island whereas most of the tourists are attracted towards the natives and the scenic views of the isle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00602409639 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70683103333 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4155767798 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148065900099 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498727973078 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532511717869 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087254026415 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476723521957 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.