Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A section of individuals believe that if a person is going through bad times then they should accept their fate whether in terms of work related dissatisfaction or lack of money, however, the rest reverse it. The upcoming fragments would shed light on both the approaches before making a final note.
To commence with the first notion, there are myraid things to be shared in its favour. First and foremost, people consider that ups and downs are part of a life, so they believe that a good time will come after a worse one. Additionally, sometimes one can't control some situations such as a long-term medical problem which can push them into a struggling economic condition. Moreover, youngsters unable to get a job according to their educational background and skills because of limited job market. Therefore, they have to compromise with a blue colllar job in meantime as it is believed something is better than nothing to survive in this world.
Shifting towards second school of thought, life is all about taking risks and overcome their fairs. For instance, it is said that if a person is born in poverty then it's his fate but if a person dies poor then it's his fault. So, a person should consider their worst scenarios as a motivation and work upon their skills to overcome life's obstacles. Futhermore, a problem can be solved in number of ways which is depend upon person's perspective and sometimes one has to take risks as future always favours the bold. For example, if a person is going through financial crisis, then he should consider about other forms of income rather than sulking upon situation.
After pondering over great deal of thoughts and deliberation, I come to conclusion that one should act upon according to their circumstances as if they can control the scenario and they should also consider other ways to solve problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... worse one. Additionally, sometimes one cant control some situations such as a long-...
^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...hat if a person is born in poverty then its his fate but if a person dies poor then...
^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...his fate but if a person dies poor then its his fault. So, a person should consider...
^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...an be solved in number of ways which is depend upon persons perspective and sometimes ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88291139241 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64419707294 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591772151899 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6920238423 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955067978645 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325036317194 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354806603151 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594709652513 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507696886231 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.