The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.

The pie chart compare the proportion of Oscar winner film in 7 different genre, documentary, thriller, romance, science fiction, action, comedy, horror, during 2003 until 2008.
Between these years, all the rate of Oscar winner film genre have changed, except comedy. The proportion of thriller dropped down significantly approximately 50% in 2003 and more than a quarter in 2008 . In detail many more action film and science fiction gained Oscar award in 2008 than 2003 moreover documentaries increased its own share in 2008 in comparison with 2003. The proportion of horror films have modest decrease during these years, although, comedy film which won the Oscar stayed the same by passing the time. Totally these pie charts illustrate that Oscar film awarded which are less exciting namely, documentary, romance, achieved more awards in 2008.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'genre' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'genres'.
Suggestion: genres
...ion of Oscar winner film in 7 different genre, documentary, thriller, romance, scienc...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... in 2003 and more than a quarter in 2008 . In detail many more action film and sci...
^^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Oscar) must be used with a third-person verb: 'awards'.
Suggestion: awards
...n film and science fiction gained Oscar award in 2008 than 2003 moreover documentarie...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 715.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37593984962 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57202983879 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654135338346 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3282962851 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377368698929 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187215162695 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704398499372 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315682888111 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262325790421 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.