The pie chart provides information about the blockbuster genres ( Thriller, documentary, romance, action, horror, comedy, science fiction) which were awarded with Oscar between 2003 and 2008.
Now, turning to the detail in 2003 the fraction of thriller genre witnessed almost a half, before it reduced to a third in 2008. The number of Oscars at the action soared tediously by around10 percent in 2008, despite of the fact that it was nearly a quarter in 2003. In addition to, the number for documentary remained the same level with trifling minorities in both years.
In comparison with the first year of science fiction leaped mildly to small portion which continued climbing with a tiny proportion in the next following year. In 2003 there was not any slight uplift or other changes in comedy and romance, turning to after five years it stayed in a similar fashion. The last type of film was horror that the achievement reached a soft upsurge to about15 percent in 2003, followed by a progressive plummet to somewhere in the vicinity of 5 % in 2008.
Overall, as you can see there was a declivity in thriller and an acclivity in action with remaining stability in other kinds such as horror, documentary and romance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information about the blockbuster genres Thriller, documentary, romance, action, ...
^^
Line 2, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with trifling minorities in both years. In comparison with the first year of sci...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...fling minorities in both years. In comparison with the first year of science fiction ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... proportion in the next following year. In 2003 there was not any slight uplift or...
^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., turning to after five years it stayed in a similar fashion. The last type of film was horror that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as horror, documentary and romance.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91747572816 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61009981891 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626213592233 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4454036649 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200518654855 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850929369853 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073527905247 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119917577147 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872732665141 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.