The chart illustrates the amount of electricity was produced by five different categories of fuel sources in two countries namely Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, sources of fuel in France was obvious more diversity than it was in Australia. Units of electricity by coal accounts for the largest proportions in both countries before the breakthrough in Nuclear Power and made it became the main fuel in France.
In Australia, coal contributed 50 out of 100 units of electricity in 1980. That number increased to 130 in total 170 units was produced 20 years later. In term of Hydro Power, though the amount of electric power was generated nearly double in 2000, the percentage of hydroelectricity still remained around 20%. Whereas, the figure for Oil and Natural Gas energy went down drastically from 30 units in 1980 to only 4 units in total in 2000.
On the other hand, France showed the major change in energy structure. In 1980, coal, oil and natural gas account for the majority of electricity production was generated with more than 70% while nuclear power contributed very minuscule. However, after 20 years of development, nuclear electricity become the crucial power in France with 126 units of production, even more than double the total units of all remaining fuel sources could produce.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of fuel sources in two countries namely Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07339449541 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77433073631 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4110746556 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257438919189 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113337302241 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591381185301 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181551383597 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390539034422 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.