The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts represent the changes in production of electricity in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000. Overall, despite some differences in fuel sources, production increased in both countries by almost double.
In 1980, both countries had a diversified fuel source economy. Australia's was dominated by coal, making up 50 units of total production. Hydropower and natural gas made up almost half of its production, at 20 units each, while oil made the least contribution at only 10 units. France, on the other hand, was equally reliant on coal and natural gas, at 25 units each. Oil also made a noticeable impact, at 20 units. Nuclear power, which Australia did not utilise, made an almost negligible part of France's total output.
By 2000, total production increased and resulted in the two countries relying heavily on one major fuel source. Australia became heavily dependent on coal, making up almost 75% of total energy. Hydropower remained fairly the same with a slight increase, from 20 to 36 units. Natural gas and oil had reduced considerably and made the least contribution to production, at 2 units each. In France, however, where nuclear power was previously at 15 units, a dramatic increase to 126 units rendered France's energy nuclear power dominant. Coal and oil still made the same impact on total output, remaining at 25 units each. However, hydropower and natural gas had drastically dropped down to 2 units each, almost disappearing completely.
From the charts, it can be deduced that whereas in 1980 Australia had a higher production than France, at 100 to 90, by 2000, with the doubling of output, France's 180 units of electricity had surpassed Australia's 170 units.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10752688172 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76747540303 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512544802867 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6776070347 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198845698302 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789467387779 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836484984963 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162932552482 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672984083391 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.