The pie charts below shows average household expenditure on 6 different items in a country in year 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information and make a report by selecting main features and make comparisons where necessary.
The two Pie Charts illustrate, information regarding average expenditure of a house on 6 different categories in a country in years 1950 and 2010.
Overall, housing which comprise three fifth (75%) of total budget in 1950 decreased to only one fifth (25%) in 2010. In 2010 food expenses made most of the budget.on the other hand healthcare remained the least priority.
To begin with, in 1950 housing contributed 72% of average household expenditure, and education about 6.6%. Both of them decreased overtime with housing showed significant decline of 50% in 2010 most amongst all, while education with a minor decrease of 0.3 percent.
Furthermore, in 1950 citizens spending on food, transportation and other were 11%, 4% and 3% respectively.The figures rose to 34% for food which was most by any category about 20%. Whereas, transportation and other figures went up 15% and 11% to end up 19 and 14% respectively .Health expenditure inclined by 2% during this time least of the increase.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... other were 11%, 4% and 3% respectively.The figures rose to 34% for food which was ...
^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and other figures went up 15% and 11% to end up 19 and 14% respectively .Healt...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d 11% to end up 19 and 14% respectively .Health expenditure inclined by 2% during...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Health
...11% to end up 19 and 14% respectively .Health expenditure inclined by 2% during this ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13580246914 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02600122809 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8273946128 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165117958943 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868799057695 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109426255342 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127559514664 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128583079059 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.