The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal;"><a name="OLE_LINK14"></a><a name="OLE_LINK13"><span lang="EN-US">The circle charts illustrate the amount of electricity generated from various fuel resources in two countries between 1980 and 2000.<o:p></o:p></span></a></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal;"><span lang="EN-US">It can be clearly seen that the generated units also increased in Australia and France despite the importance of natural gas decreased. Overall, one interesting fact was that the development of nuclear power was only applied in France.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal;"><span lang="EN-US">In 1980, the total electricity generation was close with 100 and 90 units for Australia and France, where the largest component came from coal at 50 and 25 units independently. Natural gas was the same vital as coal in France while the contribution was lower with hydropower at 20 units in Australia. As far as the least generated power in Australia and France, there were oil and hydropower at 10 and 5 units separately.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal;"><span lang="EN-US">Over 20 years, the overall produced electricity changed dramatically, 170 units were rose in Australia as well as an increase was realized in France by 90 units. Coal was still the biggest power generated source in Australia, were raised to 130 units sharply, although it remained unchanged in France. Also, the generated Hydropower was increased to 36 units in Australia whereas there were just 2 units produced with Natural gas in France. Moreover, Nuclear power became the most popular in France at 126 units suddenly. Lastly, oil and coal were fell to 2 units individually as well as became the least in Australia.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); white-space: normal;"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
...pos;MsoNormal' style='margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-famil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 498, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
...pos;MsoNormal' style='margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-famil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 977, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
...pos;MsoNormal' style='margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-famil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1642, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
...pos;MsoNormal' style='margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-famil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2504, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 0cm
...pos;MsoNormal' style='margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: medium; font-famil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 965.302439024 244% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 339.0 196.424390244 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.94690265487 4.92477711251 141% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.42010578465 2.65546596893 242% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430678466077 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 283.868780488 219% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 244.094244094 43.030603864 567% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 294.375 112.824112599 261% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.375 22.9334400587 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109025788419 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842314196336 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260961839614 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109025788419 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.5 13.2329268293 246% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 11.93 61.2550243902 19% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 6.51609756098 262% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.3012195122 214% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 23.92 11.4140731707 210% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 36.5 11.4329268293 319% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.