The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The set of four pie charts present the number of units of the electricity generated by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.
In general, the total electricity produced in australia and france were similar to each other, increased of 70 units and 80 units respectively. However, the main source of energy in australia was coal in 2000, whereas in france was nuclear power.
australia had increased the usage of coal dramatically and had slightly risen the production of hydro power by 2000, whereas other energy source(namely oil and natural gas) had significantly reduced to just 2 units. In 1980, coal accounted for 50 percent in total production, while the percentage rose around 26 percent.
In france, these five kinds of energy accounted for not over 25 percent in 1980. Nonetheless, 20 years later, nuclear power dominated the total amount of production at 126 units, accounted for 74 percent. oil had a marginal climb of 5 units, meanwhile, hydro power and natural gas both dropped to 2 units during the period in question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Australia
...ereas in france was nuclear power. australia had increased the usage of coal dramati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Oil
...at 126 units, accounted for 74 percent. oil had a marginal climb of 5 units, meanwh...
^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... units during the period in question.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75726290163 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3561825539 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316530814824 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145674612215 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168546614681 0.0843802449381 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24427219336 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199268241976 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.