Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day.
The plans depict the modifications in the Health center over the period of 12 years. Since 2005, the covered portion of a building has extended to accommodate a minor operation theater.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that interiors of the center are significantly remodeled. In 2005, the entrance was wide enough and had a huge waiting room with the reception in the middle whereas later it gets converted to side entrance having more number of seats than before.
In addition, a children's play area is present in the modern structure. Also, there were only three consulting rooms in the earlier design along with a physiotherapy room. The latter remain same in size while the former made smaller and surged to four in number. Not only this, the office has made smaller in space and reception is located in front of it.
Although, parking lot has enhanced its capacity by 18 cars while the garden reduced its size and maintained a symmetry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: same
...a physiotherapy room. The latter remain same in size while the former made smaller and surge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: four
...e the former made smaller and surged to four in number. Not only this, the office has made sma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88414634146 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61694786371 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9980709295 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0872018714894 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336748783962 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441820442704 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.048496751865 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511786462752 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.