The plans illustrate the differences of the same park but in two separated period of time.
It can be seen from the map that after refurbishment, the park is equipped with more facilities for recreation such as café shop and playground for children.
Apparently, the two ways for entering the park are not moved to anywhere else. Meanwhile, instead of three venues for planting roses as in the past, the park now has two places for plant that stands in the central area replacing the fountain and the other being situated to the northwest of current roses garden is fixed at which it was in 1920.
The glasshouse transferred it substitutes for a water feature after maintenance. The old park had five areas built for seats but now it has four and all of them gather around the central rose garden. The seats was next to glasshouse in the former park was removed and a water feature is constructed to replace. There is more entertainment on offer. Pond for water plant and the nearby rose garden disappeared due to the display of children’s play area and the coffee shop. Moreover, the old stage for performers was rebuilt and upgraded to become amphitheater for catering visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s of the same park but in two separated period of time. It can be seen from the map that aft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'all' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'alls'.
Suggestion: alls
...built for seats but now it has four and all of them gather around the central rose ...
^^^
Line 4, column 200, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... gather around the central rose garden. The seats was next to glasshouse in the for...
^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...ound the central rose garden. The seats was next to glasshouse in the former park w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, moreover, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70436666304 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3771359352 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132028309602 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611197962806 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656292602916 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110942722123 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669234982171 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.