The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the transformations of Grand Park on the Arnold Avenue compared with 1920.
Overall, the Grand Park was tremendously developed specially to improve the means of recreational activity and add some food facilities. Also, the underground parking lot was constructed what alleviated drivers with looking for appropriate parking place near the garden.
First of all, instead of three previous gardens those were situated in the south-west, north-west and north-east corners constructors decided to leave only north-western ones. The most dramatical change is that fountain located in the center of the park in 1920 gave way to the new squared unite rose garden, which is rounded by seats. What about another water attractions, the territory of pound with water plants was occupied by the children’s play area, nevertheless nowadays, builders have erected revitalized water feature just to the right from the south gate. Besides these changes, stage for musicians underwent substantial renovations and was converted into the huge half-rounded amphitheater for concerts; a new café appears adjacent to the children’ play area to recharge their batteries in time.
To sum up, the Grand park has experienced dramatical changes and has become several times convenient and revitalized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, look, nevertheless, so, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6345177665 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03374987949 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705583756345 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0864989075 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117008713471 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562674027937 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382867714057 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826309083057 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266332004205 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.