The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates how the room for two students and one student look like at an Australian university.
Overall, although both rooms have same some facilities such as bedroom, bathroom and kitchen, the decoration between two rooms have a little bit difference about some furnitures.
A glance to the plans provided reveals that both rooms have same length with 6 meters, but the width of the room for two people is slightly higher than that of other room, a different of 1.5 meters. From that, the room for two people is more spacious than the room where lived by a student. As a result this room have two beds, two study desks, bookshelf, cupboard, table and chairs, while other room has only one bed, one study desk and no cupboard, bookshelf, table and chairs.
However, having a television is a strong point for the rooms who lived by one person at a university, although bathroom in the rooms for two people is located in the top left of the room which was same with other room, More importantly, the price for the room where lived by two person is also more expensive than that of room for one people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...the decoration between two rooms have a little bit difference about some furnitures. A g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...e price for the room where lived by two person is also more expensive than that of roo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsive than that of room for one people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62311557789 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38816683352 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9140810036 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.333333333 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43253654765 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261787924888 0.103423049105 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129080188185 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300139223693 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130306383196 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.