Preferred leisure activities of Australian children

Essay topics:

Preferred leisure activities of Australian children

The bar chart compares amount of boy and girl Australian kids leisure activities they preferred. There were 5 leisure activities will be figured out and measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the highest amount of Australian boy and girl activity was similarly in watching TV and videos trend, whilst the lower trend of boy and girl differently had to be in art & craft and skateboarding or rollerblading obviously.

Regarding to the data, the most positive movement trend of the both genders was exactly the same at 100% in watching TV or videos category. Same case as the former activity, the second highest trend of the leisure activity for both genders happened to be in electronics or computer games which each gender proportion marked at 82% for the boys and 60% for the girls. It was also followed by the percentage of aport activity specifically bike riding which boys got at 76% while girls 18% lower.

Differs with those activities above, in several activities, the proportion of bogs and girls approached to balance but it was also irrevocably as the lowest trend at once such as in art and craft, the boys percentage was at 35% which the lowest trend of boys leisure activity. Besides the girls proportion in art and craft had to be at 58%. Similar case with former activity, in skateboarding or rollerblading became the lowest trend of girls joyful activity which stood at 25% while boys percentage was 14% higher than girls trend.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'boys'' or 'boy's'?
Suggestion: boys'; boy's
...d at once such as in art and craft, the boys percentage was at 35% which the lowest ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87951807229 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72881219581 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497991967871 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7057881708 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148266465316 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861711384723 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766091631639 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121239185006 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701818558034 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.