Radio and Television Audiences in UK
These line graphs illustrates the variation in the percentage of audience of two modes of transmission such as television and radio throughout a day for four months in 1992.
Overall, the trend of watching television in uk, was significantly higher than radio listeners in 1992 from october to december. However, the number of radio and television audience was equivalent to each other at 1 p.m. and 3 a.m. Although the highest gap between spectators of radio and television were at 8 p.m. Furthermore, the highest percentage of radio and television spectators was 25% and 48%.
In regard of a daytime in uk in 1992, radio listeners quickly accelerated by 28% and then starts to lessen before a noon gradually, In contrast, the percentage of television audience was relatively less by 2% and slowly rose by 7% at 8 a.m. and quickly reduced at a noon. While the number of audience of radio continue to decline during a noon to a midnight by small improvement of audience in october to december in 1992. On the other hand, the television spectator's percentage accelerated except a small reduction during a noon to 8 p.m. After 8 p.m. the number of audience of both radio and television starts to decrease at a midnight in 1992, both of their audience is at 0%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
These line graphs illustrates the variation in the percent...
^^
Line 17, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t 8 a.m. and quickly reduced at a noon. While the number of audience of radio continu...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of audience of radio continue to decline during a noon to a midnight by s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, while, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87614678899 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95925604907 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5802446752 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.166666667 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3333333333 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498249079256 0.215688989381 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269791138433 0.103423049105 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455802524531 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352199837949 0.15604864568 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924645297267 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.