These days, the world has been divided into two major sectors: wealthy and poor one. It is believed that richer nations should help poorer nations by supporting them in terms of their food or education costs. I, for one, disagree with this approach. Investigating the contribution of every country to have better finance shows this.
The government of each country is mainly responsible for meeting the needs of its people by setting effective rules that benefit the people income rather than themselves. It can be seen that wealthy countries has reached the acme of success by their nations hardwork. So, it is not plausible to expect them to provide us with a financial support. Instead, it is more likely to get them to help us by showing the best way to improve faster.
Many countries like India which is considered as a third world country, has a lot of natural resources like oil and is capable of being one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Despite the enormous population, if there is a wise government, people’s need can be effectively managed and the style of life also will be improved. A lot of Asian countries are in the same situation when it comes to having a good quality of life. They still lack the required infrastructure which is a good government.
In summary, the responsibility of satisfying a nation’s need does not fall on richer countries. It is more to do with the people in terms of striving to be more financially rewarding for the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roach. Investigating the contribution of every country to have better finance sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, third, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81322957198 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84064281743 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8798449451 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3571428571 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203071736372 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671529217665 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106269061398 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122628000924 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065517593707 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.