Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Nowadays, the world has divided into two general section: rich and poor. This is a matter of thought that if the responsibility of providing basic needs of each country lies on the government or rich countries should take part and help them. I think every country should strive to be financially powerful in order to satisfy its citizen’s need. Investigating the contribution of financial policies and national unity on the government shows this.
Financial policies of every country affects the government to have more budget and allocating this budget should be done with wise and considering the situation. For example, every country has natural resources like oil or even touristic monuments which can bring money to the country. The money brought by this should be carefully managed to meet people’s need.
We can not blame the government in all aspect. If the nation have union spirit, they can improve their condition. For instance, every employee works harder and do not cut the corners. It can enhance the efficiency and in result the country can reach the acme of success.
All in all, the responsibility of improving a country falls on its own people and the government. We can not expect other countries which has tried hard to improve help us and share their wealth with others. All we can do is to take them as an role. It is plausible to expect wealthy countries to share their experiences with us and help us with showing the way not walking with us in that way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
... the world has divided into two general section: rich and poor. This is a matter of tho...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...thers. All we can do is to take them as an role. It is plausible to expect wealthy...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88188976378 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.742430499 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547244094488 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1922333589 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153258880703 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526602364711 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498862638971 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907460108615 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027755331606 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.