Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes. DISCUSS
Many hold a belief that offspring are allowed to try anything, even errors; while opponents argue that parents should have measures to protect their children from blunder. To the best of my knowledge, the former point of view is more reasonable for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that making mistakes is one of contributive factors of bravery to enhance ability to solve problems. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the number of blunders is accompanied by the increasing lessons about contemporary society. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that failure is inevitable, and people should regard them as an opportunity for personal growth and live their life to the fullest. For example, when children made several mistakes, they would realize their weakness and improve the wrong things, which does a great job in building responsibility and persistence. Thís example is the illustration of the fact that offspring should experience challenges and falsify in social life.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that parents play an instrument in educating and preventing their children from making mistakes, because children are not mature enough to decide their actions. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that adults can not force their children to obey completely, which has resulted in feeling constrained for their children. Furthermore, parents should give their offspring opportunities to try something and make mistakes in the allowed range. As a result, these challenges and lessons are a stepping-stone to exploring themselves.
In conclusion, teenagers should do their favours including failure, which creates more experiences in social life as mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that offspring are allowed to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45862068966 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99389191903 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 106.607317073 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596551724138 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9803863346 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268983291758 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806668981233 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612841862343 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142170662761 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626032138505 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 40.7170731707 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.