There is a contentious debate going over whether youngsters should be allowed to do mistakes or parents should take actions to prevent such occurrences. This essay discusses both sides of the view and then I will give my own perspective.
It is a well-known fact that the best lessons are learnt through mistakes. In other words, humans are prone to do errors but many lessons can be learnt by going through the process of trial and error. There are many inventions throughout the history that were only possible due to mistakes. For example, invention of Cheese. Moreover, If adults often try to control activities of juveniles, it will hinder the ability of thinking out of the box, resulting less creative future generations. Not to mention the stress on both parties if there is a highly controlled environment in home.
Those who oppose say that certain errors or mistakes can be dangerous and may not be able to undone. In other words, if someone commits activity which is life-threatening, consequences could be severe. Moreover, they also claim that there is no need for future generations to go through the same process of making errors and learning, given that adults have already gone through that path and learned lessons. However, it is must be mentioned that the experience and the joy gained through correcting own mistakes by themselves is paramount for nurturing individuals, and adults can allow children to try anything they need under their supervision ensuring no harm done due to such activities.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, I believe younger generations should be allowed making errors since the experience gain through that process is invaluable and makes them more creative.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09407665505 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78964200033 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1921672361 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180271232486 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496263243928 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535591509744 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114494910505 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502359612299 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.