With the advancement of technology the food production industry has also (word order) been affected in many ways. Leveraging the latest technology, cost-effective, mass food production has become more popular nowadays. While some believe this is a positive trend, others believe that this has detrimental effects. This essay will discuss both these views and then I will give my own perspective.
Those who advocate that mass food production is beneficial may argue that it can lower the food prices. This is because when a product is manufactured in a large scale, production costs can be minimized. As a result, such food companies can offer their food products at a competitive price. Moreover, (comma) mass food production can boost (You need a verb here)the economy because it will not only maintain food prices at an affordable level, but also bring manifold indirect benefits such as increased job opportunities. For example many food companies have been able to offer a vast number of job opportunities to the unemployed local people.
Others, however, believe that mass food production has negative effects because such food often fails to meet quality standards. This is because in order to achieve higher profits, food companies often use technologies that may produce foods harmful (word order) to the general health. For example, genetically modified food has become increasingly popular nowadays, which is proven to develop detrimental effects on health. Moreover, large scale food companies can generally (Word order) control the food market keeping a monopoly, which can bring negative impact on other food producers.
In conclusion, I believe that producing food at massive levels is a positive development in terms of economic growth and sustainable food prices. However, the governments should maintain proper rules and regulations to ensure better food quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'worded'.
Suggestion: worded
...y the food production industry has also word order been affected in many ways. Lever...
^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... perspective. Those who advocate that mass food production is beneficial may a...
^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...large scale food companies can generally Word order control the food market keepi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41979522184 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83743190471 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5594796948 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264091816199 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101768866622 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805512439869 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176862556164 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333235748608 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.