Soring waste production has become one of the main problems across the world. This essay discusses the reason behind this phenomenon and explore the measures governments need to take to bring this under control.
One of the key reasons for increased production of waste is the usage of single use plastic items. World is going towards a throw away culture, and people often tend to use single purpose items such as plastic food packaging, cups or water bottles because it is easy for them and also, they are readily available at a cheaper rate. Moreover, companies worsen this situation by introducing more and more attractive and easy to use plastic packaging or products to lure customers or as a way to reduce their production costs. Another reason behind the garbage problem is increased factory waste. With the relentless population growth, more and more products need to be produced, resulting increased number of factories. Factories often produce more waste as a result of the production process. It is often the case that this waste is not managed properly because it can be expensive, leading to reduced profits, putting strain on the environment.
One of the most effective solutions to tackle this menace is governments to tighten the rules and regulations against producing single use plastics. For example, governments can ban plastic food packaging and take serious actions against the companies who violates these rules, thereby encouraging all to go for eco-friendly alternatives. Most of the European countries have already switched to using bio degradable wrappings or containers such as recycled paper. Governments also can closely monitor and regulate how factories manage their waste products, and take actions against those who violate it. Had the governments taken these actions already, we could have lived in a world without having to worry about garbage piles.
In conclusion, single use plastic items and factory waste can be mainly attributed to the increased waste production around the world. However, governments can put forward strict rules and regulations against companies and factories to eradicate this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 5.05154639175 337% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 937.175257732 194% => OK
No of words: 340.0 206.0 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34705882353 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72188999063 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 127.690721649 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 290.88556701 198% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8104470311 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 76.5299724578 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.49484536082 669% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150123123732 0.216113520407 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555311110069 0.0766984524023 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492316623348 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906936600943 0.12726935374 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246960107455 0.0580467560999 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 8.37731958763 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 8.71597938144 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 41.2886597938 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.