There is an argument that growing old in the modern world is difficult and scary. Conversely some believe that aging in the modern world is better. However, I am compelled to side with the latter. Growing in old in the modern world has more pros than cons. This is due to the advances in technology that people of advanced age may benefit from. A number of medical developments catering to the retired allow them to freely enjoy the remaining years of their life in comfort. Access to public utilities are also modernized which the elderly can take advantage of. Moreover, medical research aiming to prolong the life of our senior citizens abound. Gadgets are also available to help these individuals live serenely amidst general concerns persons of their stature may inevitably experience. Research has shown that growing old is difficult in itself and as such, having state of the art amenities enhance what is left of the older population's existence, make living still worthwhile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...he modern world is difficult and scary. Conversely some believe that aging in the modern w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 871, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...difficult in itself and as such, having state of the art amenities enhance what is left of the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 932, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populations'' or 'population's'?
Suggestion: populations'; population's
...ities enhance what is left of the older populations existence, make living still worthwhile...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57094459247 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670731707317 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9122893672 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202419423485 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860518121203 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950758005067 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202419423485 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.