Summarise the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016.
The depicted diagram enumerates the differences that have carried out in the Liverpool John Moore's University between 2010 and 2016.
Overall, Liverpool John Moore's University was completely transformed with the establishment of various developmental infrastructure. However, Admin Building wasn't altered.
Over the period, the area witnessed dramatic changes. The Car Park in the south-west was replaced with Bus Station in 2016. In addition, the old road running from east to south was replaced by a new Footpath leading from west to south.
Furthermore, the library seems to have renovated and reopened as a library & IT Suite in 2016. Moreover, the cafe was constructed in the adjacent library & IT Suite in 2016. A new lecture theatre is supposed to have built next to the Admin Building by replacing the Car park. Similarly, biology, chemistry, as well as physics building were replaced with Science Building in 2016. Surprisingly, Admin Building wasn't modernized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...infrastructure. However, Admin Building wasnt altered. Over the period, the area...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 410, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...g in 2016. Surprisingly, Admin Building wasnt modernized.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02768847587 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2904283942 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8181818182 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6363636364 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241877490946 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824323199614 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111196058411 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176482554179 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12323456158 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.