The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The depicted piecharts enumerate the comparative data on certain employment patterns in Great Britain in the respective year 1992.

Overall, the majority of people of Great Britain had experienced the highest trend on management and professional whereas, General laborers is undoubtedly the lowest portion throughout the year.

To initiate, around 27 percent and the roughly one-quarter ratio of female and male, respectively experienced in other manual's profession. However, the most marked change had seen in clerical or related as well as craft or similar, where the roughly one-quarter female had dominated male. However, nearly a quarter ratio of the male had prevailed female, simultaneously.

On the contrary, the most proportion of both sexes seem to engage in managerial and professional occupation at 29 percent of women and 36 percent of men. Furthermore, around 9 percent and 6 percent of female and male seem to have indulged in other non-manual professions. Surprisingly, both male and female had experienced the least portion on general laborers at 2 percent and 1 percent, accordingly.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'manuals'' or 'manual's'?
Suggestion: manuals'; manual's
...male, respectively experienced in other manuals profession. However, the most marked ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 2 percent and 1 percent, accordingly.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57058823529 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16254573117 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1990790422 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0590173263239 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324008442993 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590394466175 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619583190342 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715825213153 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.