Table
The given table illustrates average distance travelled per person in England in miles in the years 1985 and 2000. There are total seven modes of travel described in table namely, walking, bicycle, car, local bus, long distance bus, train and taxi.
First of all, total number of miles travelled per person is moderatly increased in 2000 than 1985, as total 6475 miles travelled in 2000 whereas only 4740 miles travelled in 1985 per person including all modes. In 2000 distance travelled by walking and bicycle was slightly decreased than 1985 whereas distance travelled by car increased in 2000 approximate around 20% than 1985. Major decline was seen in using of local bus, as its distance reduced almost half, 429 mile to 274 miles in 1985 to 2000 respectively.
Secondly, people were less preffering long distance bus, train and taxi, thus the distance travelled by those modes were 54, 289 and 13 miles in 1985, although in 2000 those travel modes became popular and the distance increased to 124, 366 and 42 respectively. Other modes of travel also being more used by people and its distance also gone up to 135 miles.
Overall, in 2000 people were more using advanced vehicles like car, bus, train and taxi rather than taking a walk or bicycle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- The chart below shows information about the amount of reader of the age of 16 29 and 30 who use device for reading 73
- Many offenders commit more crime after serving punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 73
- Information Table
- Line Graph 67
- The diagram shows the process by which milk and related products are produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91549295775 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33142911691 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8411033833 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0582878045874 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458236339304 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798718976333 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592717959461 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102661762035 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.