the table above shows changes in the number of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011

Essay topics:

the table above shows changes in the number of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

the given chart compares the number of inhabitants who cycled to work in detached areas of the UK from 2001 to 2011.

overall, It is clear that there was a general upward trend in the proportion change of people travelling to work by bicycles in all areas shown throughout the 10-years period. Inner London was the only area that had the largest number of citizen riding bicycles to work in both 2001 and 2011.

in 2001, inside London had over 43 thousand commuters cycling to work, around 10 thousand higher than outside London. This figures for others were under 10 thousand units, while the least statistics for Cardiff, with just over 8 hundred units.

in the next 10 years, Inner London saw the sharpest change in the percentage of people commuting to work, with a growth to 106 thousand, increased by 144% above 2001. Brighton and Hove had the second highest rise with an increase by 109%. Outer London still occupy the second position in term of the number of people cycling to work, despite of its least percentage change in 2011, at 45%.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-24 levanhoan123 73 view
2022-08-23 levanhoan123 78 view
2021-11-11 kindlebalada 100 view
2021-02-13 Isha Mehra 78 view
2020-12-01 sanjana rani 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given chart compares the number of inha...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...d areas of the UK from 2001 to 2011. overall, It is clear that there was a general u...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ycles to work in both 2001 and 2011. in 2001, inside London had over 43 thousan...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...iff, with just over 8 hundred units. in the next 10 years, Inner London saw the...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73913043478 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27275305021 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1969549796 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285343912769 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133406656216 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104527387809 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195694079107 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977567621 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.