The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from, and the charts show how it was distributed. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making relevant comparisons.
The given table and pie charts compare the amount of police budget and the source of fund as well as the portion of money expend in thrice different sectors in a state of the UK in 2017 and 2018.
Overall, it can be deemed that most of the money were investing in wages for officers and staff in 2017 and 2018 which were almost similar by 75 1. And 69% namely.
First of all, a vast number of funds came from National Government which were 175.5 million pound in 2014 which is increased by 177.8 million pounds in 2018. In 2017 Local taxes were given by 91.2 million whereas 102.3 million were received in 2018. Moreover, Other sources for example, grants were donated almost came amount by 38 million and 38.5 million in 2017 and 2018 respectively.
On the other side, in pie charts, 75 % and 69% money consume for salaries in 2017 and 2018 namely while no more than 8%. was spent by technology which was climbed up by 14%. in 2017 in 2018. and buildings and transport were invested by 17%. in both years in an area of Britain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Was
... and 2018 namely while no more than 8%. was spent by technology which was climbed u...
^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...technology which was climbed up by 14%. in 2017 in 2018. and buildings and transpo...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...was climbed up by 14%. in 2017 in 2018. and buildings and transport were invested b...
^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ngs and transport were invested by 17%. in both years in an area of Britain.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for example, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4502617801 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15217005311 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565445026178 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.5117878455 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184723359817 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755929880191 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569861437332 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122182551388 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502757580535 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.