Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways.
Discuss both the view and give your opinion.
The significance of industries were always debatable which have now become more controversial with many people believe that these are beneficial while others disagree. In my opinion, the later proposition in more logical. However, a number of individuals feel that government should fixe higher taxes on different factories to remove pollution, others assume that there are fine solutions instead of rising vat. Thin essay will elaborate attributing this trend with perspective views in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays a huge number of industries are discharging carbon dioxides in air and river, which create air and water pollution as well as sound pollution. Moreover, if governments take a large number of taxes from companies, it will assist to consume environment pollution through closing some factories. Duse to the fact that small industries would be unbaled to show interest manufacturing goods and authorities can be shut down those companies. However, if most of the less important factories will have closed, the surrounding area will look greener and people also take breath in fresh air.
On the other hand, when a large number of companies will close, many young individuals will become unemployment and effect on economic development in the world. Furthermore, if authorities move all industries to village from city center, it cannot be spoiled income sources of many poor and middle-class people. For example, a survey done by 'BBC News’ in Bangladesh, some of the largest companies recently shifted the factories in few rural areas to reduce pollution from cities. Therefore, it is clearly mentioned that it is possible to solve pollution problem instead of increasing tax on several industries.
In conclusion, according to the arguments it is mention above one con reach to a conclusion that the benefits of industries are indeed too great. However, I think authorities should be more concerned to prevent this situation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ollution. Moreover, if governments take a large number of taxes from companies, it will assist to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n fresh air. On the other hand, when a large number of companies will close, many young indivi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4025974026 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9280962554 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626623376623 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2941497506 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205146226495 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603622139305 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354837037738 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106613492991 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506888150054 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.