The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below

The table illustrates the number of hours people in different age brackets in Someland allocate for their 6 pastimes per year. Overall, watching TV/videos has the highest time spent for, while people convey the least interest in going to the cinema. It is also an noticeable point that the young under 20s spend an influx number of hours for recreational activities.

Teenagers and people aged over 70 significantly use an excessive amount of time for watching TV and videoss, with 1200 and 1100 respectively. These two age groups additionally allocate time for cinema with the time hovering from 75 to 100 hours in a basis year, which moderately higher than other age groups.

According to the data on the chart, people could notice that hours people spend on have a correlation with aged bracket. Socialising with under four people and individual exercise are usually done by the middle-aged, coming up to 300 and 200 hours for each categories, which is an impressive figure. Two remaining recreations consisting of socialising with four or more people and croup exercise possess the figure of hours allocated shrinking coincide with the age of paticipants, from 350 and 450 hours, and the ederly roughly don't take part in these pastimes as well.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rest in going to the cinema. It is also an noticeable point that the young under 2...
^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...0 and 450 hours, and the ederly roughly dont take part in these pastimes as well.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06280193237 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73541739836 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4082573018 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232198603665 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117712453229 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072060272017 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171456091987 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648615545052 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.