The data shows the percentage of five different countries consuming variety of goods in the year 2002.
It is evidently seen that most of the countries spend for edible goods and tobacco while, allocate least amount of money in leisure and education.
Turkey is the highest spender among the five countries. The information shows that Turkish people Are an active consumer on goods with 31.4% and in the category of Education with 4.35%. Somehow Ireland share the same priority with consumable goods with 28.9%. While Sweden shared the lowest proportion of expenditure in food products (15.77%) same in clothing and footwear (5.40%), but with exception in leisure and education.
In the category of clothes and shoes, Italy is the top user of these products. With 9.00%, Italy buy clothes and shoes more than the rest of the countries. Others like Ireland (6.43%), Spain (6.51%), and Turkey (6.63%) shows almost the same percentage respectively. It is also interesting to know that in the field of education and leisure, Spain allot the least expenditure while hAving average percentage in other criteria.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'allocate the least'.
Suggestion: allocate the least
...end for edible goods and tobacco while, allocate least amount of money in leisure and educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Spain) must be used with a third-person verb: 'allots'.
Suggestion: allots
...e field of education and leisure, Spain allot the least expenditure while hAving aver...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17318435754 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53134896824 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6334546555 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129223804336 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548287154206 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090718634049 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111773454448 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119292883591 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.