The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for.
The table shows that small companies the best to work for have things in common but also differ from each other. In terms of staff numbers second, third, and fourth companies are extremely similar, however, the first one is comparatively low when the fifth one has a much higher staff number than other companies.
All companies have a higher female proportion than males apart from third and fifth companies. The third company has the highest proportion of male staff, although the fifth company does not have a high rate of male staff. The fourth company has 13 to 87 proportions of females which is the highest female proportion.
Some companies have fairly similar percentages of staff that are under 35s and they do not have any staff over 55s, while the second company has 1% and the fourth company has 8% of staff that are over 55s. The fifth company has the highest percentage of staff that are under 35 besides, as for staff turnover this company has the highest percentage with 33%. Nevertheless, the first company has the lowest percentage of staff turnover. Concerning staff earning high incomes, the second one has about half, the third one about three quarters while the first one has lower and the other two companies have far lower percentages.
The overall picture is that all companies are slightly different and have different advantages that make them popular even though salaries do not seem to be a major factor.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, apart from, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90204081633 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40756132221 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497959183673 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5253775382 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.1 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251587090578 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122218832678 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534567401894 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14883350442 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064853222789 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.