The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table illustrates the detailed information about the number of native speakers in several languages and people who consider these as their additional knowledge.
At first glance, while Mandarin Chinese ranks first in the figure for the native speakers and the total speakers, most people tend to seem English as their option. In addition, there is the smallest number of speakers who believe that Portuguese is not dispensable.
On average, although there is exactly 900 million Mandarin Chinese native speakers of 1090 million in total, only 190 million people seeming this as an additional language. Next comes English, which accounts for 942 speakers. Nevertheless, the number of speakers who tend to think English like an optional language is approximately 6-fold as large as that of Mandarin Chinese. Besides, the lowest figure for all kinds of speakers goes to Portuguese, at 203 million native ones, only 10 million people as an additional language of 213 million people.
It is noticeable that the numbers of native speakers are always larger than that of people as an optional language, except English. To be more precise, Arabic has more native speakers than ones as an additional language, at 182 million people. Also, there are 250 million and 280 million speakers of disparities between the Hindi and Spanish native speakers and ones as options respectively. Conversely, the number of speakers of English as an option is around twice as large as that of native ones.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... twice as large as that of native ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, first, nevertheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20416666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68327833795 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8437841125 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148246816915 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699566388712 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534646466289 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120045640779 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619195564536 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... twice as large as that of native ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, first, nevertheless, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20416666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68327833795 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8437841125 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.545454545 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148246816915 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699566388712 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534646466289 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120045640779 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619195564536 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.