A glance at the table provided illustrates the differences in the age, size, and passengers per year of underground railway system in six cities.
It is such a clear-cut evidence from the provided information that the first three metro systems opened sooner have bigger size of route and larger number of annual passengers than the others.
To begin with, it can be seen clearly that London, Paris, and Tokyo have older subway system, which was opened in 1863, 1900, and 1927 respectively. In particular, the age of these systems is directly proportional to the kilometres of route, standing at 394 kilometres in London, 199 kilometres in Paris, and 155 kilometres in Tokyo. The striking feature is that although London metro system opened earlier and has longer route, its passengers every year is fewer than nearly one-half of metro system in Paris and Tokyo (775 millions passengers per year).
Coming to the rest of the table, Washington DC subway system was released sooner than the others (in 1976). As a result, it has the longest route and the largest number of annual passengers, accounting for 126 kilometres and 144 million passengers. After 5 years, Kyoto also opened its metro system. Nevertheless, its size of system and number of passengers served per year are the lowest with only 11 kilometres and 45 million passengers. Ranking second in the underground railway system group is Los Angeles that was released in 2001 with 28 kilometres of route and serves 50 milliom passengers every year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in particular, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.048 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67132925713 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.022216738 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112073314176 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521428151724 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517422200633 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931827714833 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586184728704 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.