The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities
The table shows data about the underground railway networks in six major cities in the world, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles.
The table compares the six networks in terms of their age, size and the number of people who use them each year. It is clear that the three oldest underground systems are larger and serve significantly more passengers than the newer systems.
London underground is oldest systems, having opened in 1863. It is also the largest system, with 394 kilometres of route. The second largest systems, in Paris, is only about half the size of the London underground, with 199 kilometres of route. However, it serves more passengers per year. While the third in terms of size, Tokyo is easily the most used, with 1927 millions people per year.
Of the three newer underground systems, the Washington DC system is the most extensive, with 126 kilometres of route, compared to 11 kilometres and 28 kilometres for the Kyoto system and the Los Angeles system respectively. The Los Angeles system is the newest, having opened 2001, while the Kyoto system is the smallest and serves only 45 passengers per year
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who use them each year. It is clear that the three oldest underground systems are...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the oldest'.
Suggestion: is the oldest
... the newer systems. London underground is oldest systems, having opened in 1863. It is a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95384615385 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52357718618 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7428812741 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226803100146 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885749441648 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732345586582 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15759791975 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723603468449 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.