The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
The table compares the numbers of waste that were produced by six nations from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, except for Korea, the amount of waste production increased in five out of the six countries. Besides, the US always produced the largest waste for over 20 years.
The waste of the US rapidly rose from 131 (1980) to 192 million tonnes (2000). Between 1980 and 1990, waste production also climbed quickly, in Japan and Korea, from 28 to 32 and from zero to 31 million tonnes, respectively. By 2000, while Korea tended to reduce its waste to 19 million tonnes, the waste of Japan went up gradually to 53 million tonnes.
Between 1980 and 2000, waste production slowly increased, in Poland and Portugal, from 4 to 6.6 and from 2 to 5 million tonnes, respectively. From 1980 to 1990, the waste of Ireland decreased slightly from 0.6 million tonnes to the bottom. By 2000, although the production rose to the same number as Portugal, this level still was the lowest point.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43006685371 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8284941704 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228646951861 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113008202207 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361254543628 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152515578827 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210850569105 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.