The given vertical bar graph illustrates the information about the number of detainees in Great Britain, America, New Zealand, Australia and Canada from 1930 to 1980 in thousands.
Overall, Canada had high number of prisoners in 1930.Britain had less number criminals.However, number of prisoners rised in Britain in next 50 years. America had the highest number of detainees in 1980.
It can be clearly seen that In year 1930, prisoners were around 30 thousand in Britain , but after 50 years number increased to 80 thousand in 1980. Whereas, in Australia imprisonment rate dropped in given time period which was 70 thousand in year 1930 to came just under 50 thousand in year 1980. Detainees in America and New Zealand were 100 thousand in 1930. However, in 50 years prisoners in New Zealand dropped to 80 thousand. Whereas America showed increase in the number of prisoners with 130 thousand in 1980.
Moving further, Canada was on the top list of all nations in imprisonment in 1930 with 120 thousand prisoners which fell down to just under 100 thousand in year 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Britain
...da had high number of prisoners in 1930.Britain had less number criminals.However, numb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less numb'?
Suggestion: less numb
...number of prisoners in 1930.Britain had less number criminals.However, number of prisoners ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... 1930.Britain had less number criminals.However, number of prisoners rised in Britain i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...oners were around 30 thousand in Britain , but after 50 years number increased to ...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...umber increased to 80 thousand in 1980. Whereas, in Australia imprisonment rate dropped...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in New Zealand dropped to 80 thousand. Whereas America showed increase in the number o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75861615051 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8087783262 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122327452463 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667855714022 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335198722081 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820228774525 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240056724832 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.