The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall, a public place for hiring over the period of three years.
The table compares the amount of money which Harckley Hall earned and spent for on hiring in a-3-year period.
Overall, there was an up trend in income of coffee while profit tent to reduce. Income from hiring room, tax and money from some kinds of fund fluctuated.
Tax is the most important source of income in Harckley Hall in three years with $75.000, $78.000 and $71.000 respectively. The amount of money which stem from hiring accomodation raised slightly from $33.000 in the first year to $34.000 in the second year, then this figure declined to $32.000 in the third year. Coffee is the only field which income increased significantly from $3.000 in the first stage to $6.000 in the final year. In contrast, funding from local council remained unchanged in two years with $20.000 then decreased by $5.000 in the three year, whereas funding from different bodies dropped from $22.000 to $20.000 during three years.
In terms of expenditure of this public place, there was a rise in the second year by $8.000 before reducing to $71.000 in the final year. Profit decreased dramatically from $9.000 in the initial stage to only $1.000 after three years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80612244898 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26904912317 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2614788878 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158340108687 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905118739937 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731615136666 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137983325207 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081179313247 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.