The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The three pie charts indicate the variation of yearly expenditure which a specific school in UK spends in the years 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Overall, the budget of school for teachers’ salaries made up the highest percentage. The amount of money which school spent on teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment and resources such as books fluctuated while there was an opposite trend between other workers’ salaries and insurance.

Looking at the details, teachers’ salaries constituted the largest cost to the school during a period of 20 years. This figure changed continuously and fluctuated around 45%. The expenditure for furniture and equipment witnessed a dramatically from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991, then raised nearly fivefold to 23% in 2001. By contrast, the cost of resources has reverse trend with an increase by 5% in the first stage, following that this statistic declined considerably from 20% in 1991 to 9% in 2001.

There was an up down trend in the school spending on other employees’ salaries, which saw a fall from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001. Whereas, the percentage of the annual cost for insurance quadruplicated from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001 although it was still the category which accounted for the smallest proportion among others fields.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mallest proportion among others fields.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, still, then, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15639810427 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05501615289 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568720379147 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7371920642 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173358487676 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786011702289 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757514376939 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128907838103 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920193792817 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.