5.The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries

Essay topics:

5. The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries

The pie charts illustrate the information about the ways employed by international students when buying the online English courses in three countries between 2009 and 2010. Overall, the proportion of students in all countries booking online English courses through the Internet witnessed an upward trend. However, the percentage of students who pre-booked their courses through agents increased in Canada and the USA but decreased in Australia.
In 2009, 24 percent of students in Australia booked these courses via the Internet, compared with 25 percent and 27 percent in the USA and Canada respectively. This percentage increased in 2010, at 39 percent, 28 percent and 30 percent in Australia, the USA, and Canada respectively. In 2009, the percentage of students booked English courses via arrival was highest in Canada and Australia, at 30 percent. It was 24 percent in the USA. In 2010, it noticed growth in Australia, at 35 percent. Meanwhile, the USA saw unchanged and Canada increased, at 24 percent and 15 percent respectively.
The percentage of students who pre-booked with agents in Australia and Canada were the same, at 26 percent. It was lower than the USA, at 23 percent in 2009. In 2010, this percentage decreased in Australia, at 17 percent. However, the USA and Canada witnessed an upward trend, at 26 percent and 35 percent respectively. The percentage of students booked English courses via other was down in Australia and the USA over the period of time, from 20 percent to 13 percent and from 28 percent to 22 percent respectively. While, this percentage was up in Canada, from 7 percent to 20 percent in 2009 and 2010 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... down in Australia and the USA over the period of time, from 20 percent to 13 percent and from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08058608059 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91834055854 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388278388278 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6003898619 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.26666666667 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154802920791 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079168434976 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10685057016 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176305095466 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1618851942 0.0819641961636 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.