The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table illustrates the difference in the amount of visitors before and after during the year of refurbishment of Ashdown Museum. While the pie charts compare the percentages of how satisfied people feel about the museum in two period.
In general, it is clear that a huge increase in the number of people visiting the museum was witnessed after refurbishment. Besides, more visitors were likely to appreciate the changes when the museum was repaired.
Looking at the table, the number of visitor in the year before refurbishment stood at 74000, this figure increase considerably to 92000 during the year after. Before the reconstruction, the dissatisfaction took up the largest part at 40%, followed by 30% and 15% of the people who were satisfied and very satisfied, respectively. Only one in ten number of people who were very dissatisfied and the last 5% of people who did not give response to the survey.
Regarding to the year after refurbishment, the percentage of dissatisfied visitors decreased significantly, accounting for only 15%. The number of people who were satisfied led the board at 30%, followed by that of people very satisfied at 30%. Finally, the percentages of visitors who were very dissatisfied or even did not respond shared the same rate of 5% each.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ear of refurbishment of Ashdown Museum. While the pie charts compare the percentages ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, look, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07582938389 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04898869595 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511848341232 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4151734323 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.1 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377535339753 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159140909492 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930416017099 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247332637579 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747360849681 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.