school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012
The bar chart illustrates total spending for schools in Singpore. While the pie chart shows the percentages of number of education diplomas and degrees students gained over 12 years period from 2000.
Overall, the amount of money spended on boy schools rose steadily over the years. In addition, the proportion of students who gained diplomas was significantly higher than that of those who gained degrees in both 2000 and 2012.
According to the bar chart, the money for boy schools stood at 9 million. This figure increased gradually to 20 million and 26 million in 2004 and 2008, respectively. In 2012, spending reached a peak of 32 million. However, the expenditure of girl schools witnessed a slight increase. The number began at 7 million in 2000, rose slightly to about 13 million in 2004, remained stable in the following year and peaked at 20 million in 2012.
The proportion of higher education students who gained diplomas experienced a moderate decrease from 2000 to 2012. The percentage declined from roughly 73% to 68% in 2000 and 2012, respectively. The opposite was witnessed in the rate of those who graduated with degrees, from 27% in 2000 to 32% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | hongchau | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | Minty@1411 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | nguyen duc | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... a moderate decrease from 2000 to 2012. The percentage declined from roughly 73% to...
^^^
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to 68% in 2000 and 2012, respectively. The opposite was witnessed in the rate of t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7057182284 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4460021506 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471160337139 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172427425014 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18245753009 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308811839888 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149397635514 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.