The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012
The bar chart gives information about the total amount of money invest in students’ schooling in terms of boys and girls. The pie chart compares the number of learners in higher education who gained diplomas and degrees in Singapore in the years of 2000 and 2012.
Overall, total school spending showed an upward trend over the given period. In addition, a sharply high proportion of students were rewarded diplomas in comparison with those gaining degrees in the specified country.
It can be seen that around 9 million dollars was spent on schooling boy at the beginning of the period. The figure continuously rose to reach to $20 and nearly &26 million respectively by 2004 and 2008. After that, spending hit over &30 million in 2012. Whereas, the figures of the opposite sex-gender presented lower expenses. In 2000, with $7 million paying for schools, however, spending on girls’ school saw a slightly increase, reaching a peak of $20 million in 2012.
It can be noticeable, there was a steadily growth in the proportion of learners who were rewarded degrees with respect to higher education. The percentage increased from 0.27% in 2000 to 0.32% in 2012. By contrast, the number of diplomas rewarded for students decreased slightly by 5% in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spending hit over &30 million in 2012. Whereas, the figures of the opposite sex-gender...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... presented lower expenses. In 2000, with million paying for schools, however, spe...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...resented lower expenses. In 2000, with million paying for schools, however, spending o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... however, spending on girls’ school saw a slightly increase, reaching a peak of 0 million in 2012. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., reaching a peak of 0 million in 2012. It can be noticeable, there was a steadi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...12. It can be noticeable, there was a steadily growth in the proportion of learners who were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, in addition, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02884615385 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6889917767 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1777830533 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401052263815 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125613437834 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122996640713 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245675354077 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126828644547 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.