People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
Over many decades, environmental matters have always been a controversial topic from all citizens around the world. Many people propose that uplifting the petrol prices can make an important to reducing the issue related to environment such as global warming, greenhouse gas. Though I side with the statement, I hereby suggest some other feasible ways to improve the quality of environment.
On the on hand, it is true that national authorities plat a vital role in environmental problems. By putting a sharp rise in natural gas prices into action, car owners and scooter are likely to consume less as a result, a reduction in mass commute by private vehicles and any kinds of journeys running on roads will be made. Moreover, it is likely for residents use public transport instead of their own transport due to payment for pricey costs of fuel. To encourage citizens using of public vehicles, local governments should raise their own awareness towards problems of environment which have detrimental impacts on human-being’ diverse aspects of lives. Secondly, with respect to viewpoints of freight services, merchants may find feasible alternative ways to deliver merchandises in case the official regulation on a sharp increase gas costs. Both these measures would cut down on emission from high volume of vehicles, aid to recover the quality of atmosphere.
Contrary to the temporary solution to fuel prices, some other potential ways should be taken action to address environmental issues. The government can impose strictly regulations to control and reduce the upcoming number of private vehicles running on roads. For example, local authorities can implement strictly laws to control the driving test. Furthermore, as fro daily commute, the government should encourage co-operations to produce a mass number of environmentally friendly transports like using electric transports or usage of bicycle more regularly.
In conclusion, I consider increasing natural gas prices is one method of controlling the usage of private car ownership and other vehicles. However, other feasible measures also increase current environmental situations. Especially, people should lend their hand along with authorities to solve the problem together that have significant effects on future generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... and scooter are likely to consume less as a result, a reduction in mass commute b...
^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ntrol the driving test. Furthermore, as fro daily commute, the government should en...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54415954416 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99552835952 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618233618234 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1689540498 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259315361203 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072909222956 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432297526127 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151307221712 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546363494373 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.