The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart gives information about the amount of kilometers that British who commute by five diverse sorts of transports in the years of 1990 and 2000.
Overall, the initial impressive from the chart is the total proportion of kilometers travelling by the nation’s citizens experienced an upward trend. Besides, the majority of residents opted bus and rail as favorable means of commuting in comparison with the remaining modes of transport.
In 1990, bus dominated the amount of kilometers travelled around 40 billion while that of rail was slightly lover with 38 billion of passenger kilometers. Over following ten years, the figure for both these kinds of vehicles increased to reach equivalence amount with 42 billion for bus and 41 billion for traveler kilometers of rail.
Apart from those, there was a relatively growth in the number of air kilometers from 5 or lower billion in 1990 to around 6 or 7 billion in 2000. With respect to bicycle and bike, both of which witnessed a downward trend in period of 10 years by 4 or even smaller and around 6 billion respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the remaining modes of transport. In 1990, bus dominated the amount of kil...
^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
... of rail. Apart from those, there was a relatively growth in the number of air kilometers from 5 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...umber of air kilometers from 5 or lower billion in 1990 to around 6 or 7 billion in 200...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, while, apart from, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94535519126 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79561474338 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 11.7803017875 43.030603864 27% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227073686216 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107716610595 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743149295087 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146711648222 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693796084442 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.