The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given chart illustrates the distance traveled by the UK habitants using five different types of vehicles from 1990 to 2000. The unit is measured in billion kilometers.

Overall, with the exception of bicycle and motorbike, travelling in total increased. It is also noted that bus and rail were the two most popular types of transport in the 10-year period.
In 1990, the total passenger kilometers started at 100 billion kilometers and climbed to over 110 billion kilometers in 2000. Specifically, bus and rail travel accounted for the largest distance achieved, at 45 and 40 billion kilometers respectively in 1990. Both experienced a moderate rise to approximately 50 billion kilometers in the next 10 years.
By contrast, distance covered by each of the remaining means of transport, namely bicycle, motorbike and air, were comparatively modest with just under 8 billion kilometers in 1990. While that by bicycle and motorbike dropped slightly by 2 billion kilometers, air travel grew and finished the period at 10 billion kilometers.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...m 1990 to 2000. The unit is measured in billion kilometers. Overall, with the except...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ured in billion kilometers. Overall, with the exception of bicycle and motorbike, travelling in to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30722891566 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99383044906 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2203979652 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125410753841 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545797252252 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560984124047 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866789582872 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482450374307 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.