Some people believe that in order to improve educational quality, we should encourage students to make comments or even criticism of their teachers, but others think it will lead to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many individuals argue that provoking students to give reviews of their teachers is crucial to enhance teaching quality, some would advocate that this may disorganize class rules. This essay will discuss both opinions and argue in favor of the former.
On the one hand, allowing learners to give feedbacks on their teachers has several drawbacks. Firstly, students, especially at a very young age, can be disrespectful and disobey to their teachers. Teachers do not always meet the expectation of young students and can bring them discomfort occasionally. For example, if a child is encouraged to give their opinions on a compulsory subject which they do not find enjoyable, it is understandable that they will associate their teachers with it and therefore grow negative attitude towards their teachers. Secondly, it will be extremely challenging for a teacher to keep control of the class with students rising their voice constantly. This will cause an adverse affect within school sites because classrooms can become a chaos and teachers may feel stressed out because of it.
However, students commenting on their teachers may bring about positive impact in terms of educational effectiveness. Anyone needs reviews in their profession in order to improve and teachers are not exceptional. Students feedbacks would be most suitable since they are familiar with their teacher's presentation and teaching methods. At the same time, students can give proper recommendations and advices so that teachers can deliver information more efficiently and learning sessions can be more appealing. In addition, if students feel free to express their learning experience, they are more likely to raise hands in class and upgrade their overall productivity. In this way students can produce better learning outcomes.
In conclusion, it is unavoidable that allowing students to give feedbacks on their teachers may lead to numerous problems. However, I believe that the advantages that this practice bring outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...an produce better learning outcomes. In conclusion, it is unavoidable that allo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50798722045 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95646120603 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0352701062 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223600755635 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819634921994 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391184406603 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139890797991 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169538611189 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.