Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other think that it is necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinion and give your own opinion.
It is argued that visiting some countries is a great ideal to assimilate knowledge about the other places and cultures. While nowadays, detractors share an idea that all knowledge obtained while travelling can be absorbed from the internet and broadcast programs due to rapidly evolving of the fast-spaced technology. in my perspective, the essay will discuss both strength and weakness of the matter before presenting my own ideas.
On the one hand, nothing compares to the travelling which help visitors have deeper insights into new places while they are really there. Taking a journey out their countries make an important contribution to likely supporting them to authentically see, hear, smell as well as taste something surrounded them. Therefore, they can gain totally new feelings and impression which they are not capacity of experiencing from online or TV screens. For example, take Vietnam, you cannot know everything about the country and Vietnamese, but also experience authentic street food from bustling or ancient areas. By doing so, walking around some places has its own advantages over just listening or watching about it.
On the other hand, there have been a variety of TV-shows, travel vlogs, web services and channels related to discovering human-beings and interested areas all over the world which definitely supply adequate information about all aspects of life, human, language, populace in those territories. It is more beneficial for those who cannot afford to travel in any nations due to prohibitively expensive expenses to keep abreast of information via the social networking sites and TV programs. Consequently, they can absorb valuable information from such videos including language dialects, cuisine, rituals and so on about any countries in which they have more concerns about. In my own opinion, both viewpoints have its followers according to their conditions.
In conclusion, it is hard to say that travelling is the best choice to assimilate loads of knowledge in foreign places, or watching TV program and browsing websites is alternative to travel. We can state that two points can be used as support to each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...evolving of the fast-spaced technology. in my perspective, the essay will discuss ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, really, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87515379646 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634502923977 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0750226328 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246856799328 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779280132085 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378040178935 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149787787447 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430268020632 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.