The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.
The upper graph gives information about the changes in the proportion of travelers who commute by trains in an unspecified geographical location between 2000 and 2009 while the lower one shows the number of trains running on time in a 10-year period in comparison with the fixed target.
Overall, the number of passengers who travel by trains show an upward trend in a given period in spite of having a significant fluctuation. The rate of trains running on time was also erratic, meeting and exceeding the target in a span of 2002 and 2005, and again in the years of 2008 and 2009.
In the first four years, the amount of train commuters rose slightly from around 37 million to its first peak at 42 million in 2002, before dropping in 2003 with the figure being equivalent to the beginning span. Also in that time, the percentage of on time trains went from an inadequate figure around 92% to a sufficient 95%. During the next three years, the number of train passengers experienced an increase and then reach the most significant peak of over 45 million. Afterward its figures went down by 4 million. Similarly, there was a downward trend in the proportion of trains running on time approximately 92%, apart from a standardized number of 95% in 2004.
In the last years, the amount of trains that head off stations on time climbed gradually to hit a remarkable amount to 97% in 2008 and the figure plateaued at the same percentage. Whereas, the number of passengers stabilized at around 43 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od in comparison with the fixed target. Overall, the number of passengers who tr...
^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...igure plateaued at the same percentage. Whereas, the number of passengers stabilized at...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, apart from, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74809160305 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68235628774 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519083969466 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3587025575 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433012021217 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160897053314 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925645132683 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259332793245 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875221312432 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.